|
05 January 2012
This article was published in the Hill Times on December 5, 2011 by Senator David Angus and Senator Grant Mitchell.
The Keystone XL pipeline decision splashed across major newspaper and
twitter feeds illustrates an increased appetite by the public to engage
with energy issues. As heated debate swirls among pundits,
environmental groups and energy stakeholders, it can be difficult for
Canadians and policy makers alike to evaluate competing claims and
interests. So where does Canada go from here?
There are complex challenges facing us today and we need to
collaborate widely to transform rhetoric into viable long term
solutions. Future generations of Canadians are counting on us to get
this right.
For our part, as members of the Standing Senate Committee on Energy,
Environment and Natural Resources’ we identified that there is an urgent
need for a national energy discussion and we launched a comprehensive
study on Canada’s energy future over two and a half years ago. Our study
provides a discussion venue for energy sector experts, government
policy makers, aboriginal and industry leaders, environmental
organizations and concerned citizens. Our study is enriched by the
collaboration of over 200 witnesses from across the country.
Our hearings highlighted a fragmented energy conversation in this
country. Individuals and organizations are passionately involved in the
energy future debate, but many of these discussions are occurring in
silos. Without bringing together environmental and economic interests,
without recognizing a strong national discussion can only take place
with increased energy literacy, we are not fully capitalizing on the
home-grown ideas, innovations and efforts needed for Canada to prosper.
Not enough Canadians celebrate Canada as a major energy producer and
exporter. As a nation our quality of life is shaped by our abundant
natural resources and our ingenuity to develop them responsibly.
Addressing our climate change challenge requires enhanced energy
literacy among all Canadians. Collectively, we need to better
understand how the lights go on in our homes and our individual impacts
on the environment. Informed energy citizens of today are the energy
heroes of tomorrow. Our clean energy future will involve tradeoffs and
difficult policy making decisions. Informed energy citizens will support
and encourage smart energy choices.
Just this past week, we completed public hearings in part of Canada’s
energy heartland, Alberta and British Columbia. A variety of witnesses
provided a wide spectrum of opinions and viewpoints. Here is a summary
of highlighted challenges and opportunities we heard.
Canada needs to gain access to new energy markets in order to get a
competitive price for our products and to diversify away from reliance
solely on the US market. Delay can mean being locked out from
opportunities to meet Asian energy demand. Massive deployment of new
energy infrastructure is needed. We heard, however, repeated concerns
about the capacity of the regulatory process to approve major new
projects in a timely way. The pace and duplication in the regulatory
process must be addressed while we continue to demand the highest
environmental standards and while respecting our Constitutional
commitment to First Nations peoples.
Innovation across all energy sources and production processes must be
dramatically ramped up. Witnesses stressed that technological
deployment and innovation is key to both addressing climate change
challenges and sustainably supplying growing global energy demand. One
witness stressed, that funding everything produces mediocre results, not game-changing technologies.
Industry abhors a regulatory vacuum. We have heard consistent calls
from industry for greater certainty regarding emission reduction
regulations. After our hearings in the West, we are left with no doubt
that the federal government has set itself very ambitious emission
reduction targets. Industry, however, is missing the necessary signals
it needs about the policies to meet these target that are essential to
long term planning and investment decisions. Many witnesses called for
market based policy instruments to allow industry the maximum
flexibility in their compliance, and at the most efficient cost.
The committee was impressed with the Horn River Basin Producers group
approach to aboriginal community engagement. This group brings together
stakeholders and producers to address in a collaborative way concerns
like aboriginal employment and job training opportunities. This model is
being studied by other producers and even being exported to other
countries.
We toured Westport Innovations, a Vancouver based company that leads
the industry in developing liquid natural gas technologies for medium
and heavy vehicle fleets. This company has partnered with Robert
Transport, a Quebec transport company deploying LNG engines in their
trucking fleet. This is an example of the pan-Canadian collaboration
that will drive our energy future. On another site visit the Natural
Resource Canada’s CanmetENERGY Research Centre in Devon Alberta,
Committee members were shown leading edge technology by passionate
researchers who were committed to excellence in oil sands production and
processing.
After completing public hearings in all ten provinces we are in the
homestretch of our study. We hope our report, due June 2012, based on
the testimony we have heard will serve as a resource for all Canadian as
they collaborate on a Canadian Energy Strategy.
Senator David Angus serves as Chair and Senator Grant Mitchell
serves as Vice-Chair of the Senate Standing Committee on Energy, the
Environment and Natural Resources. The Committee is holding public
hearings in Saskatchewan and Manitoba December 6th -9th, 2011. Find out more about the Committee’s study at www.canadianenergyfuture.ca or follow us on twitter @sceenr_says.
|